<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozilla Fennec Available for HTC Touch Pro Owners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilewhack.com/mozilla-fennec-available-for-htc-touch-pro-owners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilewhack.com/mozilla-fennec-available-for-htc-touch-pro-owners/</link>
	<description>All The Latest Cell Phone, Gadget and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 05:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fennec Alpha 1 released for Windows Mobile 6 - Specs, reviews and prices.</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilewhack.com/mozilla-fennec-available-for-htc-touch-pro-owners/#comment-26985</link>
		<dc:creator>Fennec Alpha 1 released for Windows Mobile 6 - Specs, reviews and prices.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 05:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilewhack.com/?p=25334#comment-26985</guid>
		<description>[...] Desktop, so here it is (9.4MB heavy).  But keep in mind that this release has been tested on the HTC Touch Pro only, so if you are installing it on any other device, just beware.  For those who still think [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Desktop, so here it is (9.4MB heavy).  But keep in mind that this release has been tested on the HTC Touch Pro only, so if you are installing it on any other device, just beware.  For those who still think [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: powerball</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilewhack.com/mozilla-fennec-available-for-htc-touch-pro-owners/#comment-17657</link>
		<dc:creator>powerball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 05:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilewhack.com/?p=25334#comment-17657</guid>
		<description>I decided to give it a try on the 800w just for kicks anyways the browser took a few seconds to launch and typing in wmexperts took almost 2 seconds per letter but the page did LOAD in about 30-40 seconds, i don't know why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I decided to give it a try on the 800w just for kicks anyways the browser took a few seconds to launch and typing in wmexperts took almost 2 seconds per letter but the page did LOAD in about 30-40 seconds, i don&#8217;t know why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
