<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Has Invalid Mac OS Copyright According to Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilewhack.com/apple-has-invalid-mac-os-copyright-according-to-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilewhack.com/apple-has-invalid-mac-os-copyright-according-to-apple/</link>
	<description>All The Latest Cell Phone, Gadget and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will Apple Ever Be The Same? &#124; LinkTouch</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilewhack.com/apple-has-invalid-mac-os-copyright-according-to-apple/#comment-14909</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Apple Ever Be The Same? &#124; LinkTouch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilewhack.com/?p=22345#comment-14909</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple Has Invalid Mac OS Copyright According to Apple  The Apple vs Psystar saga is far from being over. Psystar has mounted an offence after its last at&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple Has Invalid Mac OS Copyright According to Apple  The Apple vs Psystar saga is far from being over. Psystar has mounted an offence after its last at&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilewhack.com/apple-has-invalid-mac-os-copyright-according-to-apple/#comment-12483</link>
		<dc:creator>D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilewhack.com/?p=22345#comment-12483</guid>
		<description>If I remember correctly, the copyright registration is not mandatory in the US. As long as you've put something out with the copyright symbol and the date (or year) - it's valid. It's more difficult to prove that you own the copyright without the registration, but it's not impossible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I remember correctly, the copyright registration is not mandatory in the US. As long as you&#8217;ve put something out with the copyright symbol and the date (or year) - it&#8217;s valid. It&#8217;s more difficult to prove that you own the copyright without the registration, but it&#8217;s not impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
